Bereavement, the experience of losing a loved one, is a profound and often devastating life event that can significantly impact an individual’s cognitive, emotional, and psychological functioning. The grief that follows such a loss can be intense and prolonged, potentially leading to complications in the mourning process. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the potential of cognitive interventions, particularly working memory training, to mitigate the negative impacts of bereavement and facilitate healthier grieving processes. This essay examines the scientific evidence regarding the efficacy of working memory training approaches in addressing bereavement-related challenges and promoting adaptive coping mechanisms.

Working memory, a cognitive system responsible for temporarily holding and manipulating information, plays a crucial role in various cognitive processes, including attention, decision-making, and emotion regulation. Research has shown that grief can significantly impact working memory functioning, potentially exacerbating the emotional distress associated with loss and hindering the grieving process (Maccallum et al., 2023). Given the importance of working memory in cognitive and emotional regulation, interventions targeting this system may offer promising avenues for supporting bereaved individuals.

One of the primary ways in which working memory training may benefit bereaved individuals is through its potential to enhance emotional regulation capabilities. Emotional regulation is a critical aspect of adaptive grieving, as it allows individuals to process and cope with the intense emotions associated with loss. A study by Huang et al. (2019) found that mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), which incorporates elements of working memory training, improved the well-being of bereaved individuals by enhancing their cognitive performances. The researchers observed that after an 8-week MBCT programme, bereaved participants showed reduced internetwork connectivity in the salience, default-mode, and fronto-parietal networks during resting state, suggesting alleviated attention to spontaneous mind wandering.

Furthermore, the alterations in functional connectivity between subcortical and cortical networks were associated with changes in mindfulness scale scores, anxiety levels, and emotion regulation abilities. These findings indicate that interventions targeting working memory can modulate brain circuits implicated in grief processing and emotional regulation, potentially facilitating adaptive coping mechanisms.

The potential of working memory training to address specific cognitive deficits associated with bereavement has also been explored. Maccallum et al. (2023) highlighted that bereaved individuals often report difficulties in concentration and decision-making. Working memory training may help alleviate these cognitive impairments by strengthening the neural networks involved in attention and executive function. This, in turn, could enhance an individual’s ability to engage in adaptive coping strategies and navigate the practical challenges that often accompany bereavement.

While the direct application of working memory training to bereavement contexts is still an emerging field, insights can be drawn from related areas of research. For instance, studies on the effects of working memory training on depression and anxiety, which are often comorbid with complicated grief, have shown promising results. Koster et al. (2017) found that working memory training led to reductions in rumination and depressive symptoms in individuals with depression. Given the overlap between depressive symptoms and those of complicated grief, these findings suggest potential benefits for bereaved individuals experiencing prolonged distress.

The timing of working memory interventions is a crucial consideration in the context of bereavement. Research suggests that early interventions may not always be beneficial, as they may interfere with natural grieving processes. Bonanno’s work on grief trajectories has demonstrated that the majority of bereaved individuals (approximately 60%) show remarkable resilience and do not require intensive interventions (Bonanno, 2004). Therefore, it is essential to carefully assess the need for working memory training interventions and target them towards individuals at higher risk of complicated grief or prolonged distress.

One area where working memory training may be particularly beneficial is in addressing intrusive thoughts and memories associated with the loss. Bryant et al. (2020) found that targeting loss-related memories and negative loss-related appraisals through cognitive training interventions can mediate the effect of these factors on symptoms of Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and depression. Working memory training could potentially enhance an individual’s ability to manage and process these intrusive cognitions, thereby reducing their impact on overall grief symptoms.

The potential of working memory training to address cultural variations in grief experiences is another important area of consideration. Maccallum et al. (2023) noted the need for cultural adaptations of trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapies to ensure their effectiveness across diverse populations. This is particularly relevant in the context of bereavement, as cultural factors can significantly influence grief expressions and coping mechanisms. Working memory training interventions may need to be tailored to account for these cultural differences to maximise their efficacy.

While the evidence supporting the potential benefits of working memory training for bereavement is growing, it is important to note that research specifically focused on this application is still limited. Many of the insights discussed here are drawn from related fields or from studies that incorporate working memory training as part of broader cognitive interventions. As such, there is a clear need for more targeted research to fully understand the impact of working memory training on bereavement and grief processes.

Longitudinal studies are particularly needed to better understand the long-term impacts of working memory training interventions and to differentiate between acute reactions and later adaptation processes. Additionally, more research is required to compare the effectiveness of working memory training with other cognitive interventions and to identify which approaches are most suitable for specific grief presentations.

It is also important to consider potential limitations and challenges in implementing working memory training for bereaved individuals. Grief is a complex and highly individual experience, and a one-size-fits-all approach is unlikely to be effective. Moreover, the cognitive demands of working memory training may be challenging for some bereaved individuals, particularly in the acute stages of grief when cognitive resources are often depleted.

Despite these challenges, the potential of working memory training to support bereaved individuals remains promising. By enhancing cognitive control and emotional regulation capabilities, such interventions may help individuals navigate the complex emotional landscape of grief more effectively. Furthermore, by addressing specific cognitive deficits associated with bereavement, working memory training could potentially reduce the risk of complicated grief and promote more adaptive long-term outcomes.

In conclusion, while direct evidence for the efficacy of working memory training in bereavement contexts is still limited, insights from related fields suggest that such interventions may offer valuable support for bereaved individuals. By targeting key cognitive processes implicated in grief adaptation, working memory training has the potential to enhance emotional regulation, reduce intrusive thoughts, and improve overall cognitive functioning in the wake of loss. However, careful consideration must be given to individual needs, cultural factors, and the timing of interventions. As research in this field continues to evolve, it is likely that more refined and targeted working memory training approaches will be developed, offering bereaved individuals enhanced support in navigating the complex journey of grief and loss.

References

Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20-28.

Bryant, R. A., Kenny, L., Joscelyne, A., Rawson, N., Maccallum, F., Cahill, C., Hopwood, S., Aderka, I., & Nickerson, A. (2020). Treating prolonged grief disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(8), 870-881.

Huang, F. Y., Hsu, A. L., Hsu, L. M., Tsai, J. S., Huang, C. M., Chao, Y. P., Hwang, T. J., & Wu, C. W. (2019). Mindfulness improves emotion regulation and executive control on bereaved individuals: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 541.

Koster, E. H., Hoorelbeke, K., Onraedt, T., Owens, M., & Derakshan, N. (2017). Cognitive control interventions for depression: A systematic review of findings from training studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 53, 79-92.

Maccallum, F., Dawson, K., Azevedo, S., & Bryant, R. A. (2023). Challenges in grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy for prolonged grief disorder. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(4), 271-286.

I am an experimental psychologist and cognitive neuroscientist, working as a PhD researcher in the Centre for Cognition, Computation and Modelling at Birkbeck, University of London. My work investigates the architecture of working memory, how our highest cognitive functions develop and change across the lifespan, and the design of interventions to support cognitive health, particularly in ageing.

My professional foundation in psychology and cognitive neuroscience is built upon over fifteen years of continuous, hands-on research and applied practice. This extensive trajectory is formally validated by a portfolio of over 245 accredited Continuing Professional Development and Continuing Medical Education certificates, reflecting a sustained and profound dedication to expertise.

My work is defined by established, evidence-based concentrations in complex, high-impact areas:

  • Clinical & Neurocognitive Health: My advanced expertise encompasses the neuroscience and clinical management of degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Multiple Sclerosis, alongside neurodevelopmental conditions including ADHD and Autism. I also maintain a command of trauma-informed care, epilepsy, sleep disorders, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders.

  • Women's Mental Health & Lifespan Care: A core area of my practice focuses on women's mental health, with in-depth knowledge of disorders where biological and psychological health intersect. This includes specialised proficiency in perinatal and postpartum mental health, perimenopausal and menopausal mood disorders, the psychological impact of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis, and the mental health dimensions of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease.

  • Intervention, Innovation & Cognitive Healthspan: My concentration is in designing both cognitive rehabilitation strategies and evidence-based programmes for healthy cognitive ageing. This involves the applied use and governance of AI in healthcare, machine learning for health equity, gamification in treatment, and deploying integrated telehealth platforms to support cognitive vitality across the lifespan.

  • Inclusive Practice & Scientific Leadership: My work is grounded in expert knowledge of mental health leadership, team-based care models, and the psychology of influence. It is further informed by advanced, practical training in diversity, equity, and inclusion—with a particular focus on LGBTQ+ health, mitigating unconscious bias, and providing culturally integrated care—all governed by a rigorous framework of research ethics and science communication.

Outside of academic research, I design and build proprietary digital tools for cognitive intervention. This work is the foundation of NeuxScience, a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform that I architected and developed. The system leverages my own machine learning models and data science pipelines to deliver personalised, adaptive cognitive training by integrating my research on higher order cognitive functions directly into the platform's core logic.

I am committed to making the science of the mind clear and useful. Through my writing, I aim to educate, share evidence, and show how research in cognition and brain health can be applied in everyday, meaningful ways.

In my life beyond work, I am a mother and wife, managing a very full home with three boys, four dogs, and five cats.