Introduction

Depression in children and adolescents represents a growing public health concern, with rising prevalence rates observed in recent decades. It is estimated that up to 20% of youth may experience depression before adulthood, with potential implications for academic performance, social development, and lifelong mental health. Early identification and intervention are crucial to mitigate these consequences and promote healthy trajectories into adulthood (Lu et al., 2024).

Common Causes of Depression in Children and Adolescents

  • Biological and Genetic Factors

Depression in youth demonstrates significant heritability, especially as children move into adolescence. Children with a parent or sibling who has depression are two to four times more likely to develop the disorder themselves. Beyond genetics, biological mechanisms such as dysregulation in neurotransmitter systems (e.g., serotonin) and abnormal stress hormone responses contribute to vulnerability. Puberty brings hormonal changes that may interact with genetic predispositions and amplify risk, particularly among girls (Maughan et al., 2013; Bernaras et al., 2019).

  • Cognitive Vulnerability

Maladaptive cognitive styles—such as persistent negative self-evaluation, catastrophizing, and hopelessness—can set the stage for depressive episodes. These cognitive vulnerabilities may emerge from inherent temperament and learned patterns, especially in the context of adverse childhood experiences. Children who blame themselves for negative outcomes or struggle to reframe setbacks are at heightened risk for developing persistent depressive symptoms (Bernaras et al., 2019).

  • Family Dynamics

High-conflict, low-support family environments are linked with increased depression risk. Parental depression, harsh parenting styles, chronic criticism, or emotional neglect can directly affect a child’s self-worth and ability to manage stress. Supportive and communicative families can buffer children against adversity, even with other risk factors present. Stressors such as divorce, parental incarceration, or household instability also disrupt emotional security (Malhotra, 2018).

  • Social and Environmental Stressors

Peer relationships—and disruptions thereof—are crucial in adolescence. Experiences such as social exclusion, bullying (both traditional and cyberbullying), and academic pressures contribute significantly to emotional distress. Loss of friendships or romantic relationships during these formative years has outsized emotional impact. Exposure to trauma (physical, emotional, sexual abuse; community violence) is well-documented to associate with later depression, potentially via post-traumatic stress pathways (Malhotra, 2018; Cheung, 2021).

  • Sociocultural Changes

Macro-level factors also matter. Rapid societal change, shifting family roles, and increased use of digital technology introduce new stressors and reduce in-person support networks. Stigma around mental health and barriers to care in some cultural contexts may result in underdiagnosis or delayed treatment, compounding negative outcomes for youth (Bernaras et al., 2019).

Empirically-Based Treatments

Psychosocial Interventions

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

CBT is a highly researched and effective intervention for pediatric depression. It emphasizes identifying and challenging depressive thought patterns and teaches skills such as problem-solving, emotion regulation, and behavioral activation. Sessions are structured, goal-oriented, and may involve family members. Meta-analyses show CBT reduces symptom severity and prevents relapse, especially when tailored to developmental stages (Espada et al., 2023; The Lancet, 2023).

  • Interpersonal Therapy (IPT)

IPT focuses on improving interpersonal relationships and resolving grief, social isolation, and conflicts. It helps youth recognize how relationships affect mood and develop healthy communication strategies. IPT is particularly beneficial for adolescents struggling with losses or social stressors (Espada et al., 2023).

  • Other Interventions

Family-based and group therapies can complement individual treatment, especially when family or peer difficulties predominate. Computer-assisted CBT has shown promise in increasing accessibility and adherence, addressing barriers to in-person care (Espada et al., 2023).

  • Long-Term Outcomes

Sustained gains from psychotherapy are enhanced by booster sessions and parental involvement. Early treatment not only addresses current symptoms but may change negative developmental trajectories, reducing chronic or recurrent depression risk into adulthood (The Lancet, 2023).

Psychopharmacologic Interventions

  • Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)

Medication is typically reserved for moderate to severe depression or when psychotherapy alone is insufficient. Fluoxetine has robust evidence for efficacy and safety in children and adolescents. Other SSRIs (e.g., sertraline, escitalopram) have some supporting evidence but are less established for younger patients. Initiation of medication requires careful risk-benefit analysis and family collaboration (Strawn et al., 2022; Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2013).

  • SNRIs and Alternatives

SNRIs and tricyclics are less favored due to limited efficacy and safety concerns in youth (Strawn et al., 2022).

  • Combination Therapy

Combining psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy often yields superior outcomes, particularly in severe or treatment-resistant cases, addressing biological and psychosocial contributors concurrently (Strawn et al., 2022).

  • Monitoring and Adjusting Treatment

Regular follow-up assessing symptom change, side effects, and adherence is essential. Treatment adjustments should be based on clinical course and patient/family input (Strawn et al., 2022).

Antidepressants and Suicide Risk

  • Risk of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors

Meta-analyses indicate an increased risk of suicidal ideation and behaviors in youth on antidepressants, with a pooled relative risk around 1.38 compared to non-medicated peers. The risk is especially pronounced during the first weeks of treatment or post-dosage changes. However, no statistically significant increase in completed suicides is found (Li et al., 2022; Wise, 2016).

  • Clinical Implications

This low absolute risk mandates a structured approach: screening for suicidality before treatment initiation, educating families about warning signs, and close monitoring during early treatment phases (Li et al., 2022).

  • Risk Mitigation

Using the lowest effective dose, slow titration, family safety planning, and coordination with schools and caregivers are practical strategies. Nonpharmacologic treatments should be prioritized when suicide risk is elevated (Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2013).

Conclusion

Pediatric depression arises from complex biological, psychological, and social factors. Early, developmentally attuned interventions prioritizing psychotherapy with family and school support form the foundation of care. Psychopharmacology, mainly SSRIs like fluoxetine, plays a role in moderate to severe cases but demands careful risk management. Vigilant collaborative care optimizes outcomes for affected youth.

References

Bernaras, E., Jaureguizar, J., & Garaigordobil, M. (2019). Child and adolescent depression: A review of theories, evaluation instruments, prevention programs, and treatments. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 543.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2013). Depression in children and adolescents. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 110(12), 200–208.

Espada, J. P., Orgilés, M., Morales, A., & Baca-García, E. (2023). Psychological and pharmacological treatment for depression in children and adolescents: Current evidence. Papeles del Psicólogo, 44(1), 36–45.

Li, K., Yang, C., Wang, W., & Zhu, X. (2022). Antidepressants and risk of suicide behaviors in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 312, 1–9. 

Malhotra, S. (2018). Depressive disorders in children and adolescents: A review. Journal of Indian Association for Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 14(2), 16–29. 

Maughan, B., Collishaw, S., & Stringaris, A. (2013). Depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(1), 35–40. 

Strawn, J. R., Mills, J. A., Sauley, B. A., & Welge, J. A. (2022). SSRI and SNRI efficacy in pediatric depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 867246. 

Wise, J. (2016). Risk of suicide with SSRIs remains controversial as new analysis published. BMJ, 352, i545. 

As a PhD Researcher in Computational Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology at Birkbeck, University of London, I specialise in the complex interplay between mental health and cognitive function. My practice is built on a robust academic foundation in psychology and neuroscience, complemented by counselling and psychotherapy qualifications (CPCAB, accredited by the NCPS).
My research focuses on developing innovative, gamified, and personalised working memory training, leveraging advanced computational methods, machine learning, and psychological assessment. This work directly informs my integrative, evidence-based approach to therapy and neurocognitive rehabilitation. I help clients understand that conditions like mood disorders, anxiety, and trauma can impact cognitive ability, while cognitive impairments often contribute to emotional distress. By addressing these elements together, we work to improve overall quality of life.
I am committed to making evidence-based strategies accessible for individuals facing cognitive challenges—from neurodevelopmental conditions to brain injuries and aging. Through my blog, I share insights from my work to connect cutting-edge research with real-world impact.

Accreditation & Memberships:
I am accredited by the British Psychological Society (BPS) and hold memberships with the British Neuroscience Association (BNA), the Experimental Psychology Society (EPS), the British Association for Cognitive Neuroscience (BACN), the American Psychological Association (APA), and the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA). I am also a member of the Expert Witness Institute (EWI), developing a specialised pathway in providing psychological evidence for legal proceedings.

By continually expanding my knowledge across these disciplines, I ensure my practice and research remain accurate, ethical, and relevant, and I am dedicated to translating scientific progress into practical benefits for the communities I serve.

Dorota Styk