The neuroplasticity induced by working memory training (WMT) has emerged as a significant area of research in cognitive neuroscience. Recent neuroimaging studies have provided compelling evidence for both immediate and delayed effects of WMT on brain structure and function, elucidating the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive enhancement.

Immediate effects of WMT on brain plasticity have been observed across multiple domains. Functional changes in neural activity have been documented in response to short-term training. Pugin et al. (2014) demonstrated significant alterations in brain activity during an auditory n-back task in children aged 10-16 years after just three weeks of WMT. This rapid functional plasticity suggests that the brain can quickly adapt its activation patterns in response to cognitive demands.

Changes in activation patterns following WMT have been corroborated by other studies. Buschkuehl et al. (2012) reported training-related increases in blood perfusion in frontal and parietal regions associated with n-back task performance. These findings indicate that WMT can induce immediate changes in regional brain activation, potentially reflecting enhanced neural recruitment for working memory processes.

Interestingly, some fMRI studies have observed decreased brain activation following WMT, suggesting improved neural efficiency. This phenomenon aligns with the neural efficiency hypothesis, which posits that the brain can perform tasks at the same or improved level with reduced energy expenditure after training (Neubauer & Fink, 2009).

Long-term plasticity and delayed effects of WMT have also been documented. Structural changes, such as increased myelination in white matter regions associated with working memory, have been observed by Takeuchi et al. (2014). These structural alterations may underlie the delayed effects seen in some studies, as myelination is an ongoing process that continues beyond the training period.

Sustained performance improvements have been reported in longitudinal studies. Pugin et al. (2014) observed a 4.7-fold increase in performance in the training group compared to controls after 2-6 months, indicating that WMT can lead to enduring plasticity effects. These findings align with the concept of memory consolidation, where neural changes continue to occur post-training (Dudai et al., 2015).

Neuroimaging evidence has revealed several mechanisms underlying WMT-induced plasticity. Astle et al. (2015) demonstrated strengthened connectivity within frontoparietal networks in children following WMT, correlating with improvements in working memory performance. This network-level change could explain both immediate and delayed effects of training.

Neurochemical changes have also been observed, with Klingberg and colleagues reporting alterations in dopamine D1 and D2 receptors following adaptive span training. These changes in neurotransmitter systems may contribute to both short-term and long-term effects of WMT.

Age-related differences in WMT-induced plasticity have been noted. While Thompson et al. (2016) showed that adult neural networks remain adaptive in response to WMT, the well-documented decline in working memory capacity with age, associated with reduced striatal functioning, suggests that the effects of WMT on brain plasticity may vary across the lifespan.

In conclusion, neuroimaging evidence supports a multifaceted model of WMT-induced brain plasticity, encompassing both immediate and delayed effects. These effects manifest as functional changes in activation patterns, structural alterations in white matter, modifications in functional connectivity, and neurochemical changes. The delayed effects observed in some studies can be attributed to ongoing processes of consolidation and myelination. Future research should employ longitudinal designs with extended follow-up periods to fully elucidate the temporal dynamics of neural and behavioral changes induced by WMT.

References

Astle, D. E., Barnes, J. J., Baker, K., Colclough, G. L., & Woolrich, M. W. (2015). Cognitive training enhances intrinsic brain connectivity in childhood. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(16), 6277-6283. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4517-14.2015

Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S. M., & Jonides, J. (2012). Neuronal effects following working memory training. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S167-S179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.10.001

Dudai, Y., Karni, A., & Born, J. (2015). The consolidation and transformation of memory. Neuron, 88(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.004

Neubauer, A. C., & Fink, A. (2009). Intelligence and neural efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 1004-1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.001

Pugin, F., Metz, A. J., Stauffer, M., Wolf, M., Jenni, O. G., & Huber, R. (2014). Working memory training shows immediate and long-term effects on cognitive performance in children. F1000Research, 3, 82. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3665.1

Takeuchi, H., Sekiguchi, A., Taki, Y., Yokoyama, S., Yomogida, Y., Komuro, N., Yamanouchi, T., Suzuki, S., & Kawashima, R. (2014). Training of working memory impacts structural connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(27), 8937-8947. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4842-13.2014

Thompson, T. W., Waskom, M. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). Intensive working memory training produces functional changes in large-scale frontoparietal networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(4), 575-588. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00916

Note: The reference for Klingberg and colleagues’ study on dopamine receptor changes is not provided in the given text. If you have the specific citation for this study, it should be added to the reference list.

As a research scientist in cognitive neuroscience and psychology, I write a blog exploring computational modeling and gamified working memory training. I share insights from my research on how these approaches impact learning and cognition in both typical and clinical populations, with a focus on cognitive rehabilitation for brain injuries, neurodegenerative, and neurodevelopmental conditions. My blog also covers cognitive, emotional, and behavioral assessment, the influence of biopsychosocial factors, and the application of machine learning in neuropsychological interventions. By translating complex science into accessible content, I aim to inform professionals and the public about brain health and cognitive science.

Dorota Styk